Independence, democracy and the Russian taboo
This paper argues that the relationship between Moscow and two former Soviet Republics, namely Georgia and Ukraine, has become a ‘systemic factor’ or a political cleavage in its own right. This perception or ‘framing’ of this relationship, it is observed, rests less on the actual evolution of this nexus of diplomatic relationships and more on informational strategies generated by parties, analysts and the press. This phenomenon we call the ‘Russian Taboo,’ in the sense that this perceptual frame has become a gravitational frame, leading international observers to evaluate progress in ‘transition’ of these polities by focusing on an ‘East versus West’ binary opposition. We thus trace the origins of this taboo, which culminated in the binding experience of the ‘color revolutions.’ It is then suggested that the bundling of foreign policy and democratic transitions is misguided, rendering this guiding perceptual frame redundant for the purposes of evaluating progress in the sense of democratization. Foreign policy orientation, it is suggested, exhibits much more continuity than is usually perceived, whilst democratization as a project in its own right seems to be insufficiently monitored.
- 03/17/2020 Call for Submission: “Non-Alignment Movement and Its Perspective in International Affairs”. Deadline: 1 July 2020 314 views
- 02/24/2020 A Year of Missed Opportunities for Resolution of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict (Commentary) 528 views
- 02/24/2020 The Role of Irredentism in Russia’s Foreign Policy 434 views
- 02/24/2020 Illegal Economic Activities in the Armenia-occupied Territories of Azerbaijan 376 views
- 02/24/2020 The “Frozen Conflict Perspective” in Eastern Ukraine and its Influence on Identity Construction 331 views